When a client of ours suffers a catastrophic injury there is always a search for insurance coverage to manage the extensive harms and losses experienced by the injured and their loved ones. A tree of inquiry is to be followed and it naturally begins with the driver’s insurance policies. Texas has a glut of uninsured drivers—the Department of Transportation shows as of 2014, 1 in 6 drivers is using our roads without maintaining financial responsibility.
Inadequate coverage by the owner or driver leads to an inquiry of the injured party—did they have uninsured motorist or underinsured motorist coverage (UIM)? Many people overlook the importance of purchasing this additional bit of insurance. To every driver we recommend purchasing this layer of insurance.
Sometimes there are third-party policies that may provide coverage in a catastrophic injury cases. In Texas, these policies are referred to as Umbrella Policies and usually only exist when the primary policy exceeds $300,000.00. These policies are on top of regular auto policies and must be separately searched for using databases built to find this specific layer of insurance. These excess or umbrella policies are usually meant to cover events that are not typically covered by standard policies and the policies must be read to verify applicability.
The next query is to seek the possibility of other negligent parties such as employer liability for cases involving commercial vehicles such as delivery trucks, semi trucks, 18 wheelers, construction vehicles and vehicles driven for the benefit of an employer, or in the course and scope of employment. Commercial policies, often referred to as CGL (commercial general liability), are specifically for vicarious liability issues. Knowing how to read the policies for exclusions and coverage is key to knowing what money is on the table to cover the catastrophic losses.
Trucking accidents can have layered coverage for the driver, owner, operator, and company. Typically there are layers of insurance that cover separately the owner, operator, and the company, depending on the way the driver is employed. The Motor Carrier Safety Act sets standards for insurance and endorsements on drivers and big rigs.
If you have suffered a catastrophic injury and are trying to dig through the layers of coverage and/or find coverage for your harms and losses, let us help navigate the claim so you and your family can focus on gaining quality of life and living back.
Shefman Law, Austin personal injury attorneys, handles all different kinds of personal injury lawsuits, from motorcycle accident cases to swimming pool injuries. One of the most common types of personal injury suits we see revolves around what is known as slip and fall accidents. Slip and fall accident attorneys are all sadly aware of the fact that not only can slip and fall injuries often create distressing situations for our clients, they also tend to be incredibly avoidable. Most slip and fall accidents that are the result of negligence could be prevented with a bit of foresight and care, and as Austin personal injury attorneys we believe in doing everything we can to make the situation safer for our community. Here are a few common slip and fall situations, as well as ways to avoid creating them.
Damage or Change to a Property
One of the reoccurring themes in slip and fall injury cases is a lack of property owners to properly address a change in their physical property. Whether it’s damage to a floor that creates an obstacle or a remodeling project that isn’t yet completed, failure to properly handle and address dangerous property damage is something that every slip and fall accident lawyer continually sees in cases. If you are a property owner, you’ll want to not only avoid these types of situations, you’ll also want to always properly document and mark any area that could potentially prove unsafe for guests.
Unsafe Cleaning Practices
At Shefman Law, Austin slip and fall personal injury attorneys, we’re surprised that all property owners are yet to understand the implications of not handling cleaning and maintenance with the utmost care. From recently mopped floors to areas that have been over-polished, maintaining a safe walking surface is a requirement for any space and liability can and will fall on property owners who fail to provide it. In the legal field, we utilize a coefficient of friction measuring system to determine if a floor is too slippery. Although not every property owner can maintain such a precise system, make sure to always err towards a floor that is as safe as possible in order to avoid unnecessary slip and fall accidents.
Failure To Address Weather Conditions
Even if a property owner stays up to the task of maintaining the general safety of a surface are while also avoiding dangerous cleaning practices, a slip and fall accident can still occur if weather conditions aren’t properly responded to. As slip and fall injury lawyers, we’ve seen countless cases that occur due to rain, snow, and ice, and it is up to a property owner to combat these unsafe walking conditions with effective protocol. Whether it’s salting any and all icy areas or placing rubber mats in needed areas, if you don’t maintain safe surfaces during difficult weather conditions, you may just find yourself getting a call from a slip and fall accident attorney.
Although this is in no way an exhaustive list, it should illustrate just how essential it is for any business or property owner to attentively focus on providing a safe and manageable space for all of their guests. If you’ve been in a slip and fall accident, contact the Austin personal injury attorneys at Shefman Law to find out what options might be available for you.
This is meant to be a tool for those folks who choose to represent themselves following a minor crash where they are seeking personal injury or bodily injury losses in the Texas Justice of the Peace Courts in an amount under $10,000. As Austin personal injury attorneys, we’ve noticed that often folks will choose not to hire an attorney, perhaps liability is clear they just need some help writing a letter to the insurance company. If you are not sure what to include, this sample letter will provide an idea of how to structure your letter and what to include. There are many ways to do this, this is a simple outline that we hope is useful and easy to follow. If for any reason you do need a motorcycle accident attorney or car accident injury attorney, make sure to contact Shefman Law. We fight, and we win.
REMEMBER, YOU ONLY HAVE TWO YEARS, IN TEXAS, FROM THE DATE OF YOUR CRASH, TO FILE A CLAIM AGAINST AN INDIVIDUAL OR CORPORATION THAT HAS HARMED YOU IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE.
IF YOU HAVE BEEN HARMED AS A RESULT OF A MUNICIPALITY OR STATE ENTITY (GOVERNMENT) YOU SHOULD SEEK LEGAL COUNSEL FOR THE LIMITATION ON WHEN YOU CAN BRING A CLAIM.
Sample Demand Letter for Pro Per (Self Representation) where you are seeking $10,000 and under (Justice of the Peace Cases):
This is where you provide a short statement of who you are, your age, your occupation, (a snapshot of who you are in your own words).
Include a picture of yourself. Mention that this is an offer for early resolution of your claim.
Facts Establishing Liability
Write about the crash. Where you were coming from. What the other driver did just before the crash. What you did. How the crash occurred. Be careful not to get too specific about time and distances if you are uncertain and can’t be exact. Discuss the choices the other driver made when they hit you that make the incident the other party’s fault. Liability has either been established –If it has not been established by a police report or admission of party that hit you, then state why they are at fault, for example did they violate your right-of-way? Did they run a red light? Were they talking on the phone?
How do you know they are at fault? List your observations, the other driver, witness or passenger statements. Put all of that information in this section to establish your arguments why the other person is at fault. Whatever evidence you have to support your argument, include it as an attachment and reference it in this section. Any good car accident injury attorney will want this information as well in case you do end up seeking legal assistance.
If it is a violation of a right-of-way, or a failure to stop at a red light, speeding, inattention of the other driver (driving while distracted), not keeping a safe distance provide the code section for that law and copy that law into your paragraph. For instance, most of these code sections can be found through google, but you can also look directly at this site: http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/TN/htm/TN.545.htm. Then state, the law “Sec. 545.152. VEHICLE TURNING LEFT. To turn left at an intersection or into an alley or private road or driveway, an operator shall yield the right-of-way to a vehicle that is approaching from the opposite direction and that is in the intersection or in such proximity to the intersection as to be an immediate hazard.” When Mr. Defendant Driver made the left hand turn directly into my lane of oncoming traffic, there was no time, reflexive or deliberate to avoid a collision. Therefore, Mr. Defendant Driver is liable for the resulting injuries.
(Include photos of crash or car)
Injuries Related to the Crash
What happened to you, immediate harms, treatment you received, physical losses, emotional losses (harms and losses) things you were unable to do. What were your pain scales 1-10 and list out in table format.
Provide a pain scale of 1-10 for the parts of your body injured immediately following the crash, three days after crash, one week, two weeks, three weeks, one month, etc.
1st Day 3d Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 3 Weeks 1 Month
Head: 3 5 4
For each treatment provider, list the date of treatment, the physician or therapist, then list what the record states in summary. Do this for each treatment date, and for each treatment provider.
Describe how these injuries affected your life and what setbacks, if any, the injuries caused you. List in as much detail with as many descriptor words as you can, what these injuries prevented you from doing and why. For instance, if you hurt your neck and were diagnosed with whiplash perhaps you could not drive for a period of several days. Maybe you are a new dad or mom and you could not lift your child? Describe what you were unable to do as a result of your pain.
These are the financial losses you have as a result of the crash. List every economic loss you have, this will include wages lost, medical costs, co-pays, ambulance bills, repair and replace costs of clothing you may have been wearing that was soiled or property damage. If you broke a watch for instance, provide the receipt and a photo. If you have no receipt or photo look it up on amazon and get the cost to repair and/or replace the watch. For your motorcycle, bike, or other vehicle, send the estimate to repair or replace with photos of the damage. Again, you’ll want to detail this information even if you wind up seeking the assistance of a motorcycle accident attorney or personal injury lawyer here in Austin.
For medical treatment, provide records for every item listed. Reference the record and bill and attach it to the letter in order it is mentioned in the letter or embed it into the demand with a readable snapsnot.
This section is a short recap of what happened, why liability is clear, why you are entitled to payment for reimbursement and also all of the harms and losses you suffered including lost wages, and emotional and physical pain both past and future. List your demand. Some people list demand amounts to include pain and suffering and emotional distress as a multiplier of the amount of bills they have. $1500 X2 or X3. This is a subjective number and only you know the value of your loss. If there is no egregious behavior involved and it is simple crash from simple negligence x 2 or x 3 is maybe a fair number. Remember you want to be reasonable so you can resolve the claim with the insurance company.
If writing the demand is unsuccessful you will have to pursue your claim in small claims or justice of the peace court.
Include as attachments or embedded in your document to be sent to the insurance adjuster for the defendant (not your insurance company) all documentary evidence, photos of your damaged property, your injuries, reports, bills, wage loss letter from your employer or a paycheck stub (insurance company will probably ask for a letter) etc.
Remember, you may want to give yourself time after you feel healed to make sure nothing else comes up as a result of the crash. Once you resolve the claim with the insurance company, you cannot reopen your case and ask for anything else. Your case will be resolved for all times. As Austin car accident injury lawyers, we recommend this to most clients.
THIS IS NOT MEANT AS LEGAL ADVICE OR TO SUBSTITUTE FOR LEGAL ADVICE FROM AN ATTORNEY. THIS IS ONLY A SAMPLE PRE-LITIGATION DEMAND LETTER MEANT TO ASSIST THOSE WHO HAVE ELECTED TO REPRESENT THEMSELVES IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE WHERE THE MAXIMUM VALUE OF THE CASE DOES NOT EXCEED (TEN THOUSAND) $10,000.00 DOLLARS
Preparing for trial is always the lead in to what it is all trial lawyers crave: the high emotions, the low emotions, the insane and crazy strategic gamesmanship that can be found in no other game. Litigation is like chess – only, the players are real people.
Plaintiffs are real people. Defendants, they are, well…. sort of, real people. Let me explain.
Given that it takes nearly two, three, sometimes four to five years to get the case to trial generally gives you an idea of how hard fought the case has been. In a personal injury trial situation, someone has been harmed, suffered losses and is seeking compensation for those losses, those major setbacks in their life, from the party that harmed them.
The reality is, the person that caused the harm is typically represented by an insurance defense attorney. The attorney for the insurance company and the claims representative are calling the shots. They are deciding if the case will settle, if the case will go to trial. They are playing a numbers game. Plaintiff is living his or her life. Defendants are trying to maintain their insurance policy and have to do what the insurance company tells them to do. It is a risk/reward numbers game for the defense. There is a cost benefit analysis. A rolling of the business dice. An effort to maintain a bottom line.
That is a significant fact a truth that never gets told. We have selective justice in our civil jurisprudence. Insurance lobbies are powerful and prevent jurors from hearing that there is insurance involved… though we all suspect it, it is never spoken about in a courtroom. The theory is that if jurors know there is insurance they will be more likely to apply a verdict that will make whole the plaintiff for the harms caused. If the jurors think it is coming from the pocket of the defendant, then the verdict will reflect sympathy for their fellow man and his or her bank account.
In a nationwide effort to further reduce the cost to insurance companies, medical bills – often used to evaluate how “harmed” a plaintiff was, or is – are not fully allowed to be seen by a jury. Let me explain how this has come to work in the past two years. In both CA and TX, companion cases decided near the same time, 2011, held that only the amount of medical bills actually paid by an insurance company would be presented to a jury. In other words, we all know how astronomical the cost of medical care is in the US. If jurors hear that a person claiming to be seriously injured only suffered FIVE THOUSAND ($5,000.00) DOLLARS in medical care costs, you would not assume that was very serious. What you may not hear, depending on the judge’s ruling pre-trial, is that the billed amount for medical services to the injured person was actually FIFTY THOUSAND ($50,000.00) DOLLARS. Blue Cross, Blue Shield, Aetna, Travelers, Healthnet, etc., all have agreements with the medical providers to pay set rates for various services/procedures. That reduction by contract between the insurance company and the healthcare provider/hospital, a separate agreement having nothing to do with the crash, the harms, the surgery, the pain, is the only information that will get before some juries. When that happens, the juries won’t know the actual amount billed, and more likely than not, the verdict will be anchored to the amount of bills to determine the extent of harm when deciding non-economic (pain and suffering) damages.
As I prepare for trial, I think of all the ways in which I have to word my opening, my direct examinations, my cross-examinations, my closing argument, and every other piece of evidence with insurance information on it, has to be redacted. I think about how truth in this “truth-telling” forum can only partially be told. I think about how one day, hopefully I will be preparing for a trial where I will be able to present to that jury, the WHOLE truth.
Until then, I am left to work around, strategically present my case so that the burden on the plaintiff is not so burdensomely felt. My goal: fix what can be fixed, help what can be helped, make up for what cannot be fixed or helped. I do this for the little guy, the underdog, the one fighting to make sure the bills s/he owes due to someone harming him/her don’t cost him/her his or her apartment or throw him/her out on the street, cause him/her to miss a child support payment or go so deep into debt that there is no coming out. It is a fight involving human lives. It is not about numbers and cost benefit analysis. For the plaintiff, it is about winning justice in a system that only allows the telling of half-truths. For the defendant, it is only about protecting a swollen and deeply weighted bottom line.
A deposition occurs in litigation. Witnesses, named parties (plaintiffs and defendants), experts (doctors, engineers, people with special knowledge) are all likely to have their depositions taken prior to a mediation, arbitration or trial in a lawsuit. The deposition is in effect an interrogation. That is frightening. The opposing party’s attorney will have a chance to ask you anything that is reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. That is a vast possibility of questions for the non-lawyer, anything “reasonably calculated”.
As an attorney, I have an obligation to provide my client the tools necessary to understand and succeed in deposition against a seasoned law expert, opposing counsel. We call this preparing the witness.
An attorney’s client should never go into a deposition with fears they don’t know how to handle. Client’s should clearly understand how to answer the types of questions lawyers will ask. Depositions are not customary environments where typical conversation occurs. Attorneys talk funny, and they may ask you questions in a way you are unfamiliar. An attorney that properly prepares their client may have a client that is still afraid of being deposed but the client will also have enough tools and knowledge to understand the issues, questions, language, and dialogue and how to ask clarifying questions of the attorney interrogating them.
When an attorney fails to properly prepare their client (a process that in our practice can take no less than five hours and sometimes days) is an attorney who is failing their client and ultimately the merits of the case may suffer. The preparation for deposition should begin days in advance of the client’s deposition to allow the client to ask questions about the process and their participation. The days between meeting with the client and the actual deposition taking place give the client time to digest and develop questions that their attorney can then help them with prior to the day of the deposition.
The more difficult the case, the severity of injuries involved, the complexity of the law and or the facts, will often require more preparation time with the client and never less than 3-5 hours. In bike and motorcycle crash cases the facts can often be difficult and are often highly disputed. Anytime serious injuries are involved and the client has been hurt physically and especially emotionally, be prepared to spend hours preparing with your attorney for your upcoming deposition.
Don’t go in unprepared. Don’t survive the crash to get killed in deposition or at trial. Preparation is key.
A demand letter, as the title suggests, is a letter written to the insurance adjuster of the defendant who caused your harms prior to filing a lawsuit.
I often hear plaintiff attorneys talk about getting “low balled” in their settlement negotiations by insurance adjusters following the submission of the demand letter by the plaintiff’s attorney.
Why the settlement offers are lower than you thought? You think you did everything right and wrote a great demand letter to the insurance company, but did you?
A great demand letter begins with a great evaluation of your client and the case when they walk through the door. Absolutely everything that follows after that client signs the retainer agreement should be tightly managed and under the control of the attorney who manages that client’s file.
Your evaluation the day the client walked through the door to the time you write the demand letter to the insurance company should only be reshaped by unexpected medical treatment or new facts unknown by you or the client on the day of the intake.
When writing a demand letter knowing why the defendant(s) are liable is key and every statute or municipal code that is affected and every remedy available for the harm caused to your client. A very detailed explanation of all treatment demonstrating the client’s subjective and objective complaints, treatment, if the client followed orders and protocols, the assessment by physicians and therapists, and ongoing plans for treatment must be listed in chronological order. The more you demonstrate your own understanding of the medicine involved in your client’s claim and the better you are able to explain that to an adjuster in writing the more you will satisfy the question, “Can the attorney get this across to a jury?”
Detail every cost, back up every cost you listed with why you are entitled to it. Embed as much into that demand letter as you can, attachments are difficult and clumsy. Keeping a demand letter detailed yet simple is a gift and if done right will reap better results for your client. Print your demands in color and make sure you can show pictures of before and after and why your client will do well before a jury.
Don’t cut corners when putting together a demand letter. There may have been blood everywhere at the scene of your client’s crash or incident but don’t spill new blood and reduce the integrity of your client’s claim by being lazy with putting together the demand letter. Doing this to a client’s claim is an entirely different but equally valid bloodshed.
On top of heat cramps, heat stroke, heart attack, dehydration, and good old heat exhaustion, summer walkers also have cars to worry about.
In Austin throughout 2012, 28 pedestrians were killed on Austin roadways and three cyclists. There were 12 auto v. pedestrian crashes in 2010 and 22 in 2011. One third of the pedestrian deaths have happened along side I-35 typically in lower income areas.
While Austin does not have any direct studies showing a correlation between poverty and walking deaths other states are investigating this phenomenon.
In fact, Newark, New Jersey Research from “Rutgers University has shown a strong correlation between low income neighborhoods and high pedestrian crash totals. Daniel Kravetz, who conducted the research as a graduate student, says “The higher the income level, the lower the likelihood for crashes to occur in an area.” It may seem logical to conclude that the wealthier residents are equipped with cars and simply don’t walk the streets of Newark as often. But Kate Hinds points out that pedestrian infrastructure is a major factor in the Newark accident rates. Intersections in many low income neighborhoods are lacking crosswalks, pedestrian signals, curb cuts and sidewalks.” The Dangers of Walking While Poor, JERINBRENT .
So that makes things even more tricky, walking while poor a new extreme sport. The research goes on to say that really the danger is in the lack of infrastructure for those needing to walk to get from point A to point B on surfaces that are made to keep pedestrians out of and away from the flow of vehicle traffic. Infrastructure is the key word here. Then there are the dangers of walking alone. Walking while texting we know to be dangerous, after all you have to be able to see where you are going. Then there is the danger of walking on ice, walking home alone, and the often unmentioned danger of walking too little.
I have been doing it all my life and taking for granted just how dangerous walking can be. I say this in all seriousness.
The Washington Post reported “In 2010, there were 32,885 traffic deaths in the United States, according to a new brief (pdf) from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Roughly 13 percent of those, or 4,280, were pedestrians. That’s down considerably from a decade ago, but it’s also up slightly since 2009. As NHSTA puts it: “On average, a pedestrian was killed every two hours and injured every eight minutes in traffic crashes.”
The same Washington Post article cites drunk driving responsible for 14% of pedestrian deaths. The real culprit even in this article is again, “more than 52 percent of the 47,067 pedestrians killed… between 2000 and 2009 died on principal or minor arterials. These wide, straight roads are often extremely hostile to pedestrians. They feature little to no facilities for walking, so drivers aren’t looking for people on foot.” Id. In other words, lack of infrastructure.
So, in a time when our nation is at an all time high for incidence of diabetes: According to the American Diabetes Association data from 2011 says, “ 25.8 million children and adults in the United States—8.3% of the population—have diabetes.”
When we need to be walking and riding our bikes the most, we keep focusing on motor vehicle sustainability. While our Interstate highway system is part of the reason we are an economic superpower, along with our railroads, shipping capabilities, and air transport, it is also bringing to life a too real version of Disney Pixar’s Wall-E. Interestingly, if you have been to Disney World or Disneyland lately you will also notice, this is the only production that is conspicuously enough not advertised, except by the number of humans being transported by mobility scooters. In Burlington County New Jersey the belief is that stiffer penalties for law violators will be the cure. While other sources say anything from drivers being more responsible road scanners to the opposite extreme where some folks actually say people shouldn’t be walking at all!
In this writer’s humble opinion, there are far too many preventable accidents and crashes out there. Creating infrastructure is key, especially in neighborhoods where you have higher ratios of people moving around on foot. Alcohol consumption and responsible serving of alcohol has got to be a goal insisted upon by the citizenry and the citizenry can get there with citizen alliances insisting upon harsher sentencing, stiffer penalties, and more policing of establishments that serve alcohol as well as policing roadways during the hours when most of the alcohol related incidents occur. Certainly there are more creative solutions out there and we can get there, as soon as we respect original transportation (bi-peds) as viable, necessary, worthy, and worth the tax dollars to protect because after all, who can actually argue that they simply don’t walk.
Then there is the no brainer stuff. People…..Pay Attention When You Are Driving Your Car or Truck. We the people may be walking, jogging, or riding our bikes there…..
Helmets are hot. We mean sexy. Sexy to us because it means you have a brain you want to protect. Brains are sexy. Helmets are also hot as in they can make us feel heat on our heads on an already blisteringly hot day. Therein lies the question, take it off, or keep it on?
We are all about personal freedoms and we believe this choice is certainly up to you. We want you to keep your brains and that sexy head of yours and many argue that helmets are more dangerous because we are not seen by other vehicles as “as vulnerable” when riding and cars and trucks are less cautious. Some argue that helmets make no guarantees of safe landings in crashes. There may be truth to all these arguments and we are not trying to change or shape anyone’s opinion and we respect everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Truth is, if you are hit hard enough, no helmet will protect you. True. Fair enough. But, ….take a look at this information from the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS). They have no horse in any race to increase insurance costs for riders that ride without helmets. They have no horse in the race of whether you purchase a DOT certified helmet or not. The AANS is not the government. The AANS is made up of surgeons who will treat you after your head has suffered a blow.
Shefman Law represents cyclists and bikers in Austin, Texas following traumatic brain injuries (TBI). We see the afterglow of that glorious ride without a helmet. Thankfully they don’t all end in trauma. Thankfully most rides are just that, a glorious ride. If your ride goes bad we will be there for you, with or without a helmet, no matter your choice. We just want to share some of this information.
In 2009, The American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) utilizing U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) data tracking specific instances through tracking data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) cycling related head injuries contributing to the highest number of estimated head injuries treated in U.S. hospital emergency rooms in 2009.
Cycling accounted for 85,389 head injuries in adults and in head-injury categories among children ages 14 and younger cycling accounted for 40,272 head injuries.
“A traumatic brain injury (TBI) is defined as a blow or jolt to the head, or a penetrating head injury that disrupts the normal function of the brain. TBI can result when the head suddenly and violently hits an object, or when an object pierces the skull and enters brain tissue. Symptoms of a TBI can be mild, moderate or severe, depending on the extent of damage to the brain. Mild cases may result in a brief change in mental state or consciousness, while severe cases may result in extended periods of unconsciousness, coma or even death.” (AANS)
According to the AANS every year, more than 500,000 people visit emergency rooms in the United States with bicycle-related injuries. Of those, nearly 85,000 were head injuries in 2009. There are about 600 deaths a year, with two-thirds being attributed to TBI. It is estimated that up to 85 percent of head injuries can be prevented through proper usage of properly fitting helmets.
Universal use of bicycle helmets by children ages 4 to 15 could prevent 45,000 head injuries.
So, these are real numbers. Real heads hurt. Some of them were tiny heads. That makes our head hurt. We want you to be safe, stay sexy, and if you can tolerate it, to wear a helmet. The law in Texas does not require you to but it does require we protect our little ones heads. So, let’s make sure those helmets fit properly and give them the chance to grow up and choose the answer to the question, “To Ride With or Without a Helmet?” on their own.
There are thousands to choose from and the choice can be daunting. You want to make the right decision. The relationship you forge with your attorney should be one of trust and confidence. Where to begin?
Here are the Questions we think you should ask when interviewing potential lawyers to represent you or your loved ones:
1. How many cases similar to mine have you had prior to mine?
2. How many cases similar to mine have you tried before a jury to verdict?
3. How many cases have you tried to verdict and won?
4. How many cases have you settled at the first offer without putting up much of a fight?
5. Who will be handling my case?
6. Can I reach you when I have a question?
7. How long will it take you to respond to my phone calls?
8. Will I be able to contact you by phone, email, and text?
9. Can I speak with other clients you have represented in the past on similar cases as mine?
10. Will you fight for me?
These are the top ten questions we would ask if we were hiring an attorney. These are the questions we like to be asked.
We have a focus for the same reason your doctor does. You don’t want to go to an orthopedic doctor who specializes in knee surgery for your kidney replacement surgery. Same thing goes for your attorney. Don’t survive the crash just to get killed in your settlement, at mediation or before a jury of your peers. You deserve an attorney who focuses their work on you and your type of injury and claim.
Often attorneys advertise for personal injury cases because they think they are easy and they can make a lot of money. Look at the advertisements out there. Family law lawyers are also advertising for personal injury. These are not the same areas of law and a person who spends the majority of their time representing clients in family court are not in our opinion as prepared to take your case into a civil court room where stricter laws of evidence apply.
Criminal law attorneys often advertise for personal injury law too. Ask, how many times have you filed a civil law suit? How many civil cases have you tried? Why? If an attorney is specialized in criminal law it does not mean they have a clue about civil law. This is significant this difference between an attorney who primarily represents clients in criminal court and those of us who do civil personal injury law. The bodies of law are substantially different. The strategies vary considerably. Knowing how to strategize a case on behalf of your client so that you can get the best settlement or verdict before a jury of their peers is like apples and oranges when considering how to get the best deal for your criminal client or try that case before a jury of the criminally accused peers.
Why do attorneys focus their practice or specialize?
The law is multifaceted. There are hundreds of thousands of statutes and case law to know and understand. Knowing how to navigate the complexity of a civil case is hugely different from a criminal case. The same laws do not apply. The way society views certain civil claims is different. The way society views various crimes is different.
You’ve Got a Bike? We’ve Got Your Back.
We meet attorneys often who say they do what we do. Then we start discussing cases and we learn quickly, they have no clue what we do.
Shefman Law tries cases when the defendant does not come up with the right number for settlement because we refuse to settle our clients cases for less than the full amount. Very few cases actually go to trial but you have to know you have a skilled trial attorney for when the defendant is trying to cut you short of what you deserve.
We can’t give you back your body pre-injury or your mind without the scars from the impact. The only thing we can do is seek to compensate you financially to pay off the overwhelming past and future medical costs of being injured, your wage loss, and provide you compensation for your past and future pain and suffering. We also believe justice serves the person who injured you and let’s them feel the relief of their “debt” being paid to the one they harmed.
West Fertilizing Plant in Waco, Texas explosion kills and unknown number of residents and workers, injuries too many too count.
For those seeking relief from the West Fertilizing Plant Explosion in and around Waco, Texas please refer to this article in the Waco Tribune: Fertilizer Plant Explosion Relief Links
If you can please give blood at Scott and White or your local blood bank.
If you need further assistance please call your local blood bank. Those seeking legal advice relating to injuries and property loss resulting from this fertilizer plant explosion please call Shefman Law.